点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
交通运输部：做好今年的春运工作，疫情防控很关键******
中新网1月6日电 国务院新闻办公室6日举行新闻发布会，介绍全力做好春运服务保障有关情况，并答记者问。春运工作专班办公室副主任、交通运输部运输服务司司长蔡团结表示，做好今年的春运工作，疫情防控很关键。
1月6日，中国国务院新闻办公室在北京举行新闻发布会，春运工作专班副组长、交通运输部副部长徐成光，春运工作专班办公室副主任、交通运输部运输服务司司长蔡团结，中国民用航空局总飞行师万向东，国家邮政局副局长陈凯，国铁集团客运部主任黄欣介绍全力做好春运服务保障有关情况，并答记者问。 中新社记者 杨可佳 摄蔡团结指出，春运期间，人员的流动、货运的物流活动频繁，人员交叉活动密集，感染风险大。针对这些情况，同时结合国家对新冠病毒“乙类乙管”措施的实施，春运工作专班专门印发了春运疫情防控指南，也发布了春运出行服务指引。“我们将指导各地按照相关要求和文件规定，强化全链条管理，督促我们的从业人员落实落细各项防控措施，引导社会公众做好个人健康防护，助力疫情有效度峰和平稳转段，切实保障春运平稳有序运行。”
一是强化客流组织引导。督促经营者强化客运场站的消毒通风，优化客流组织，在进站口、售票窗口及自助售取票设备、安检通道、检票口等关键部位，引导公众有序排队，具备条件的情况下，分散候乘、分散就座，同时对客流量大的线路及时增加运力，降低人员聚集度。
二是做好公众出行防疫宣传。每个人都是自己健康的第一责任人，在此，我们倡导，公众尽量避免前往疫情高流行地区，疫情高流行地区的公众也尽量减少出行，主动避免带症状出行，大家未排除感染风险前，或者出现发热等症状，尽量避免乘坐公共交通工具。乘客出行期间，也要提高自我防护意识，加强出行全过程防护。在乘坐公共交通工具期间全程佩戴口罩，主动减少聚集。
三是鼓励使用无接触式服务。我们指导客运经营者持续改善售票服务，积极推广应用线上购票、电子客票、自助验票等服务，扩大无纸化、无接触的服务范围，加快推进铁路、民航以及与城市轨道交通之间的顺畅衔接和安检流程优化，减少换乘等候时间和人员聚集，提高旅客换乘效率。
四是加强从业人员健康管理。我们督促经营者加强从业人员健康监测，实施症状管理，出现发热等症状的，第一时间报告，停止作业，必要时开展抗原或者核酸检测。加强个人健康防护，上岗期间从业人员必须佩戴口罩，做好手卫生。同时我们要求，与社会面接触较多、客流量大的一些枢纽、高速公路服务区里的相关服务人员，收费站等场所的一线从业人员，我们倡导“两点一线”生活方式。同时，上岗时要佩戴N95/KN95口罩。
五是严格落实场站防疫措施。督促经营者加强相关场站、高速公路服务区、收费站和一些交通运输工具的日常公共卫生管理，做好环境清洁消毒、通风换气，疫情严重的地区，要适当加密清洁消毒、通风换气频次，客运车辆及时开窗通风换气。
六是有效应对从业人员大面积感染。我们要督促经营者加强从业人员防疫管理，对驾驶员上岗坚持从严审慎原则，确保身体状况胜任安全行车要求。建立实施关键岗位轮岗备岗制度和跨区域人员运力调配机制，做足应对可能出现的从业人员大面积感染的准备，确保人员接替有序，服务不断不乱。
蔡团结同时呼吁各地关心关爱从业人员，具备条件的高速公路服务区、司机之家等，要设置医疗服务点，配备发热药品等必要防疫物品，提供必要的休息场所，确保从业人员有症状时能够及时用药、合理休息。
“下一步，我们将密切关注各地的疫情发展变化，因时因势调整相关政策和保障措施，指导各地统筹抓好疫情防控和春运各项服务保障工作。”(中新财经)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)